Skip to content
HomeNewsresearch
News / RESEARCH

Wearable Activity Outputs May Understate Targets for Wheelchair Users With Paraplegia

A preprint study suggests standard activity recommendations may not align with wearable-derived estimates for people with paraplegia and spinal cord injury.

Wearable Activity Outputs May Understate Targets for Wheelchair Users With Paraplegia

Rollivane editorial illustration; not a photograph of the reported event.

Based on the linked source; automatically prepared and checked against the original report.

Study design

Researchers pooled data from four studies conducted between 2014 and 2023 involving 60 community-dwelling adults with paraplegia. Participants were 45 years old on average, had been injured for about 16 years, and had neurological injury levels from T2 to L2. Individually calibrated Actiheart wearable data were analysed across roughly six days, with participants wearing the devices for 95% of each day on average.

Activity estimates

The cohort’s mean physical activity level was 1.44, while participants recorded approximately 177 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous activity per week. Regression modelling indicated that about 519 weekly minutes could correspond to the standardised physical activity level of 1.75 used in FAO, WHO and UNU guidance. The proposed figure includes ordinary moderate-to-vigorous lifestyle activity.

Implications and limitations

The authors report that research-grade wearable outputs did not align with either the spinal-cord-injury recommendation of 90 weekly minutes or the general-population recommendation of 150 minutes. Those recommendations describe additional activity beyond normal lifestyle activity. The researchers caution that, without this distinction, clinicians, researchers or people with spinal cord injury could mistakenly believe wearable readings show that recommendations have been substantially exceeded. The record identifies the work as a preprint, not peer-reviewed evidence.

Sources & further reading

Europe PMC — original report

Our editorial approach

CONTINUE EXPLORING

A little more useful reading.