Cricket vs Model F: turning space and transport trade-offs
A smaller quoted turning radius and a different folding package call for two separate demonstrations.
Read the guideDetailed specification reviews and comparisons. We distinguish research from hands-on testing.
1–12 of 12 articles
A smaller quoted turning radius and a different folding package call for two separate demonstrations.
Read the guideThese scooters solve different transport and everyday-use problems despite sharing a four-wheel layout.
Read the guideWheel-based assistance and a separate folding powerchair create very different daily routines.
Read the guideTwo carbon folding powerchairs, with different dimensions and battery arrangements to weigh up.
Read the guideCTRL+5 voice activation and LiNX SitSmarter address different steps in using powered seating.
Read the guideThe Cricket’s compact manoeuvring figures are useful, but its lowest weight excludes more than the battery.
Read the guideIts narrow body and low transport weight need to be considered alongside a much wider turning circle.
Read the guideA compact folding chair whose quoted range depends on whether one or two batteries travel with it.
Read the guideA carbon-frame option to consider when a folding chair must also provide a relatively generous seating footprint.
Read the guideAssess the fold and control experience alongside the weight you will actually put into the car.
Read the guideA specification-led look at the CMG folding platform, from the carbon-fibre frame to daily transport.
Read the guideA useful comparison of carrying weight, footprint and turning space, without a one-size-fits-all winner.
Read the guide