Based on the linked source; automatically prepared and checked against the original report.
Review scope
Researchers conducted a PRISMA-ScR scoping review of experimental and quantitative observational studies involving fencing athletes. Searches of PubMed, Scopus and EBSCOhost used fencing-related terms in titles or abstracts. The review extracted information on study design, research domain, participants, sample size, weapon discipline and geographic distribution.
Dominant evidence patterns
The review identified 445 eligible studies, with publication volume rising substantially after 2015. Laboratory studies accounted for 35.7% and cross-sectional studies for 30.3%, while prospective cohorts represented 5.4% and randomized controlled trials 4.3%. Performance and skill analysis was the largest thematic area, comprising 41.1% of research.
Gaps across topics and participants
Research on injury and epidemiology, recovery and rehabilitation, and training load or fatigue represented 7.9%, 4.3% and 1.6%, respectively. Most studies had fewer than 50 participants and focused on able-bodied athletes, leaving wheelchair fencing markedly underrepresented. Sex was unspecified in 24.3% of studies, and weapon discipline in 44.9%. The authors also reported geographic concentration in Europe and selected North American and East Asian countries, calling for more longitudinal and interventional work, stronger reporting, injury surveillance and broader representation.
