Skip to content
HomeReviewsmodel comparisons
Reviews / MODEL COMPARISONS

Cricket vs Model F: turning space and transport trade-offs

A smaller quoted turning radius and a different folding package call for two separate demonstrations.

Specification analysis · Not a hands-on test
Cricket vs Model F: turning space and transport trade-offs

Cricket. Image: Golden Technologies.

The turning figures favour the Cricket on paper

Golden quotes 22 inches for the Cricket’s turning radius; WHILL quotes 30.7 inches for the Model F. That is a useful distinction for the shortlist. It does not establish that the Cricket will suit every narrow room, because foot clearance, seating and the starting position also matter.

Do not compare unlike weight definitions

The Cricket’s lightest claim removes several components. A Model F transport comparison must use the same idea of what is included. Weigh or confirm the actual main lift, then account for the loose items separately.

A person who dislikes dismantling may value a different sequence from someone who is comfortable carrying several smaller items. Neither preference can be inferred from a single total-weight figure.

Use two trials to settle the decision

First repeat an indoor task: turn from a corridor, reach a table and leave again. Then repeat the vehicle-loading task using the same helpers and luggage. Write down where assistance or extra handling is required.

A chair may win one trial and lose the other. Decide which task happens most often and which difficulty can be resolved with a suitable arrangement. Seating suitability remains a prerequisite for either option.

A useful result sheet

TrialRecord the outcome
Indoor routeNumber of corrections and the final position beside the table.
LoadingMain lift, loose components and any help required.
Return setupTime and effort needed to restore the normal configuration.

Sources & further reading

Golden Technologies · CricketWHILL · Model F

Our editorial approach

CONTINUE EXPLORING

A little more useful reading.